java: be better than other languages

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents coffee
Weight: 0.72
, software
Weight: 0.59
, programming language
Weight: 0.58
, island
Weight: 0.57
, tool
Weight: 0.57
Siblings groovy
Weight: 0.50
, tcl
Weight: 0.46
, coffee mug
Weight: 0.37
, mocha
Weight: 0.36
, coffee maker
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than other languages 1.00
be more secure than other languages 0.93
be more secured than other languages 0.89
be better than c++ 0.82
be better than kotlin 0.82
be different than other oop language like c 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(java, be better than other languages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(java, be better than other languages)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(java, be better than other languages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(java, be more secure than other languages)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(java, be better than other languages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(java, be more secure than other languages)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(java, be better than other languages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(java, be more secured than other languages)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(java, be better than other languages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(java, be more secured than other languages)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(java, be better than other languages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(java, be more secure than other languages)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(java, be better than other languages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(java, be more secure than other languages)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(java, be better than other languages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(java, be better than kotlin)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(java, be better than other languages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(java, be better than kotlin)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(java, be better than other languages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(java, be more secured than other languages)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(java, be better than other languages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(java, be more secured than other languages)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(java, be better than other languages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(java, be better than c++)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(java, be better than other languages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(java, be better than c++)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(java, be better than other languages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(java, be better than kotlin)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(java, be better than other languages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(java, be different than other oop language like c)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(java, be better than other languages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(java, be different than other oop language like c)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(java, be better than other languages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(java, be better than c++)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(java, be better than other languages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(java, be better than c++)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(java, be better than other languages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(java, be different than other oop language like c)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(java, be better than other languages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(java, be better than kotlin)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(java, be better than other languages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(java, be different than other oop language like c)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(java, be better than other languages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(java, be better than other languages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(java, be better than other languages)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(java, be better than other languages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(java, be better than other languages)