java: be better than kotlin

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents coffee
Weight: 0.72
, software
Weight: 0.59
, programming language
Weight: 0.58
, island
Weight: 0.57
, tool
Weight: 0.57
Siblings groovy
Weight: 0.50
, tcl
Weight: 0.46
, coffee mug
Weight: 0.37
, mocha
Weight: 0.36
, coffee maker
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than c++ 1.00
be better than kotlin 1.00
has quality better 0.86
be slower than c++ 0.84
be better than other languages 0.82
is used more 0.78
is more efficient 0.78
be more secure than other languages 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(java, be better than kotlin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(java, be better than kotlin)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(java, be better than kotlin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(java, be better than c++)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(java, be better than kotlin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(java, be better than c++)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(java, be better than kotlin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(java, is used more)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(java, be better than kotlin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(java, be more secure than other languages)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(java, be better than kotlin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(java, be slower than c++)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(java, be better than kotlin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(java, be better than other languages)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(java, be better than kotlin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(java, be slower than c++)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(java, be better than kotlin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(java, be slower than c++)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(java, be better than kotlin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(java, is used more)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(java, be better than kotlin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(java, be better than c++)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(java, be better than kotlin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(java, be slower than c++)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(java, be better than kotlin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(java, be better than c++)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(java, be better than kotlin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(java, be more secure than other languages)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(java, be better than kotlin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(java, be better than other languages)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(java, be better than kotlin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(java, is more efficient)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(java, be better than kotlin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(java, is more efficient)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(java, be better than kotlin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(java, is used more)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(java, be better than kotlin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(java, be more secure than other languages)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(java, be better than kotlin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(java, is more efficient)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(java, be better than kotlin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(java, be better than other languages)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(java, be better than kotlin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(java, be better than other languages)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(java, be better than kotlin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(java, be more secure than other languages)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(java, be better than kotlin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(java, is more efficient)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(java, be better than kotlin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(java, is used more)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(java, be better than kotlin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(java, be better than kotlin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(java, be better than kotlin)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(java, be better than kotlin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(java, be better than kotlin)