java: be slower than c++

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents coffee
Weight: 0.72
, software
Weight: 0.59
, programming language
Weight: 0.58
, island
Weight: 0.57
, tool
Weight: 0.57
Siblings groovy
Weight: 0.50
, tcl
Weight: 0.46
, coffee mug
Weight: 0.37
, mocha
Weight: 0.36
, coffee maker
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be slower than c++ 1.00
be better than c++ 0.84
be better than kotlin 0.84
is slow 0.81
be faster than python 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(java, be slower than c++) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(groovy, is slow)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(java, be slower than c++) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(coffee maker, is slow)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(java, be slower than c++) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(groovy, is slow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(groovy, is slow)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(java, be slower than c++) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(coffee maker, is slow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(coffee maker, is slow)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(java, be slower than c++) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(java, be slower than c++)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(java, be slower than c++) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(java, be faster than python)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(java, be slower than c++) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(java, be faster than python)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(java, be slower than c++) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(java, be faster than python)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(java, be slower than c++) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(java, be better than kotlin)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(java, be slower than c++) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(java, be better than c++)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(java, be slower than c++) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(java, be better than kotlin)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(java, be slower than c++) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(java, be better than kotlin)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(java, be slower than c++) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(java, be better than kotlin)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(java, be slower than c++) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(java, be faster than python)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(java, be slower than c++) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(java, be better than c++)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(java, be slower than c++) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(java, is slow)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(java, be slower than c++) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(java, be better than c++)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(java, be slower than c++) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(java, is slow)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(java, be slower than c++) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(java, be better than c++)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(java, be slower than c++) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(java, is slow)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(java, be slower than c++) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(java, is slow)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(java, be slower than c++) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(java, be slower than c++) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(java, be slower than c++)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(java, be slower than c++) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(java, be slower than c++)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(java, be slower than c++) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(groovy, is slow)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(java, be slower than c++) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(coffee maker, is slow)