jaw: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents muscle
Weight: 0.63
, tooth
Weight: 0.59
, body part
Weight: 0.59
, film
Weight: 0.58
, movie
Weight: 0.56
Siblings wisdom tooth
Weight: 0.57
, nose
Weight: 0.35
, forearm
Weight: 0.35
, bone
Weight: 0.35
, skull
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
was bad 0.85
has quality spot 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(movie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(jaw, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(film, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(jaw, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(body part, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(jaw, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(tooth, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(jaw, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(jaw, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(tooth, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(jaw, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(body part, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(jaw, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(film, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(jaw, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(movie, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(jaw, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(tooth, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(jaw, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(body part, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(jaw, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(film, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(jaw, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(movie, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(jaw, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(wisdom tooth, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(jaw, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(forearm, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(jaw, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(wisdom tooth, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(movie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(jaw, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(jaw, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(film, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(jaw, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(jaw, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(body part, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(jaw, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(jaw, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(tooth, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(jaw, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(jaw, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(jaw, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(wisdom tooth, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(wisdom tooth, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(jaw, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(forearm, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(forearm, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(jaw, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(wisdom tooth, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(wisdom tooth, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(jaw, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(jaw, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(jaw, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(jaw, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(jaw, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(jaw, was bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(jaw, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(jaw, was bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(jaw, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(jaw, was bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(jaw, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(jaw, was bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(jaw, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(jaw, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(jaw, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(jaw, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(jaw, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(jaw, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(jaw, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(jaw, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(jaw, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(jaw, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(jaw, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(jaw, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(tooth, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(jaw, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(body part, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(jaw, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(film, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(jaw, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(movie, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(jaw, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(wisdom tooth, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(jaw, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(wisdom tooth, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(jaw, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(forearm, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(jaw, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(tooth, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(jaw, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(body part, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(jaw, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(film, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(jaw, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(movie, has quality good)