jaw: was made

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents muscle
Weight: 0.63
, tooth
Weight: 0.59
, body part
Weight: 0.59
, film
Weight: 0.58
, movie
Weight: 0.56
Siblings wisdom tooth
Weight: 0.57
, nose
Weight: 0.35
, forearm
Weight: 0.35
, bone
Weight: 0.35
, skull
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was made 1.00
was important in 1970s 0.78
was bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(film, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(jaw, was made)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(jaw, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(film, was made)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(jaw, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(film, was made)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(film, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(jaw, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(jaw, was made)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(jaw, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(jaw, was made)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(jaw, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(jaw, was bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(jaw, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(jaw, was important in 1970s)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(jaw, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(jaw, was bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(jaw, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(jaw, was bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(jaw, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(jaw, was important in 1970s)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(jaw, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(jaw, was bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(jaw, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(jaw, was important in 1970s)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(jaw, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(jaw, was important in 1970s)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(jaw, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(jaw, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(jaw, was made)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(jaw, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(jaw, was made)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(jaw, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(film, was made)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(jaw, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(film, was made)