jewelry: be important in fashion

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents gift
Weight: 0.64
, artifact
Weight: 0.63
, vehicle
Weight: 0.60
, accessory
Weight: 0.59
, item
Weight: 0.59
Siblings wedding
Weight: 0.62
, earring
Weight: 0.61
, wrist watch
Weight: 0.60
, wristwatch
Weight: 0.53
, fob
Weight: 0.42

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in fashion 1.00
have expensive dresses 0.75
have wow factor of chic 0.75
have dresses 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(jewelry, be important in fashion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(wedding, have expensive dresses)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(jewelry, be important in fashion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(wedding, have dresses)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(jewelry, be important in fashion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(wedding, have dresses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(wedding, have dresses)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(jewelry, be important in fashion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(wedding, have expensive dresses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(wedding, have expensive dresses)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(jewelry, be important in fashion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(jewelry, be important in fashion)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(jewelry, be important in fashion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(jewelry, have wow factor of chic)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(jewelry, be important in fashion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(jewelry, have wow factor of chic)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(jewelry, be important in fashion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(jewelry, have wow factor of chic)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(jewelry, be important in fashion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(jewelry, have wow factor of chic)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(jewelry, be important in fashion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(jewelry, be important in fashion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(jewelry, be important in fashion)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(jewelry, be important in fashion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(jewelry, be important in fashion)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(jewelry, be important in fashion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(wedding, have dresses)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(jewelry, be important in fashion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(wedding, have expensive dresses)