jewelry: have wow factor of chic

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents gift
Weight: 0.64
, artifact
Weight: 0.63
, vehicle
Weight: 0.60
, accessory
Weight: 0.59
, item
Weight: 0.59
Siblings wedding
Weight: 0.62
, earring
Weight: 0.61
, wrist watch
Weight: 0.60
, wristwatch
Weight: 0.53
, fob
Weight: 0.42

Related properties

Property Similarity
have wow factor of chic 1.00
have wow factor 0.89
is retro 0.76
have expensive dresses 0.76
be important in fashion 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(jewelry, have wow factor of chic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(wedding, have expensive dresses)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(jewelry, have wow factor of chic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(wedding, have expensive dresses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(wedding, have expensive dresses)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(jewelry, have wow factor of chic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(jewelry, have wow factor of chic)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(jewelry, have wow factor of chic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(jewelry, have wow factor)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(jewelry, have wow factor of chic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(jewelry, have wow factor)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(jewelry, have wow factor of chic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(jewelry, have wow factor)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(jewelry, have wow factor of chic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(jewelry, have wow factor)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(jewelry, have wow factor of chic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(jewelry, be important in fashion)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(jewelry, have wow factor of chic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(jewelry, be important in fashion)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(jewelry, have wow factor of chic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(jewelry, be important in fashion)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(jewelry, have wow factor of chic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(jewelry, be important in fashion)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(jewelry, have wow factor of chic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(jewelry, have wow factor of chic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(jewelry, have wow factor of chic)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(jewelry, have wow factor of chic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(jewelry, have wow factor of chic)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(jewelry, have wow factor of chic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(wedding, have expensive dresses)