jewelry: tarnish

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents gift
Weight: 0.64
, artifact
Weight: 0.63
, vehicle
Weight: 0.60
, accessory
Weight: 0.59
, item
Weight: 0.59
Siblings wedding
Weight: 0.62
, earring
Weight: 0.61
, wrist watch
Weight: 0.60
, wristwatch
Weight: 0.53
, fob
Weight: 0.42

Related properties

Property Similarity
tarnish 1.00
tarnish change 0.97
tarnish chemical change 0.92
tarnishing chemical 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(jewelry, tarnish)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(earring, tarnish)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(jewelry, tarnish)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(earring, tarnish)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(earring, tarnish)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(jewelry, tarnish)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(jewelry, tarnish)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(jewelry, tarnish)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(jewelry, tarnish chemical change)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(jewelry, tarnish)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(jewelry, tarnish chemical change)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(jewelry, tarnish)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(jewelry, tarnish chemical change)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(jewelry, tarnish)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(jewelry, tarnish change)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(jewelry, tarnish)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(jewelry, tarnish change)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(jewelry, tarnish)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(jewelry, tarnish change)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(jewelry, tarnish)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(jewelry, tarnish chemical change)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(jewelry, tarnish)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(jewelry, tarnish change)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(jewelry, tarnish)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(jewelry, tarnishing chemical)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(jewelry, tarnish)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(jewelry, tarnishing chemical)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(jewelry, tarnish)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(jewelry, tarnishing chemical)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(jewelry, tarnish)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(jewelry, tarnishing chemical)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(jewelry, tarnish)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(jewelry, tarnish)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(jewelry, tarnish)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(jewelry, tarnish)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(jewelry, tarnish)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(jewelry, tarnish)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(earring, tarnish)