jewelry: tarnish change

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents gift
Weight: 0.64
, artifact
Weight: 0.63
, vehicle
Weight: 0.60
, accessory
Weight: 0.59
, item
Weight: 0.59
Siblings wedding
Weight: 0.62
, earring
Weight: 0.61
, wrist watch
Weight: 0.60
, wristwatch
Weight: 0.53
, fob
Weight: 0.42

Related properties

Property Similarity
tarnish change 1.00
tarnish 0.97
tarnish chemical change 0.95
tarnishing chemical 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(jewelry, tarnish change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(earring, tarnish)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(jewelry, tarnish change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(earring, tarnish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(earring, tarnish)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(jewelry, tarnish change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(jewelry, tarnish change)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(jewelry, tarnish change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(jewelry, tarnish chemical change)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(jewelry, tarnish change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(jewelry, tarnish chemical change)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(jewelry, tarnish change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(jewelry, tarnish chemical change)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(jewelry, tarnish change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(jewelry, tarnish)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(jewelry, tarnish change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(jewelry, tarnish)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(jewelry, tarnish change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(jewelry, tarnish change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(jewelry, tarnish change)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(jewelry, tarnish change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(jewelry, tarnish change)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(jewelry, tarnish change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(earring, tarnish)