jock: be called jocks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents stereotype
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, clique
Weight: 0.49
, person
Weight: 0.48
, other people
Weight: 0.46
Siblings nerd
Weight: 0.33
, guy
Weight: 0.32
, cheerleader
Weight: 0.32
, chick
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called jocks 1.00
is jocks 0.99
is nerds 0.79
is stereotypical nerds 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(jock, be called jocks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(nerd, is nerds)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(jock, be called jocks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(nerd, is nerds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(nerd, is nerds)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(jock, be called jocks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(jock, be called jocks)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(jock, be called jocks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(jock, is jocks)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(jock, be called jocks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(jock, is jocks)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(jock, be called jocks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(jock, is jocks)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(jock, be called jocks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(jock, is jocks)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(jock, be called jocks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(jock, is nerds)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(jock, be called jocks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(jock, is stereotypical nerds)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(jock, be called jocks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(jock, is nerds)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(jock, be called jocks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(jock, is nerds)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(jock, be called jocks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(jock, is stereotypical nerds)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(jock, be called jocks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(jock, is nerds)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(jock, be called jocks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(jock, is stereotypical nerds)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(jock, be called jocks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(jock, is stereotypical nerds)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(jock, be called jocks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(jock, be called jocks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(jock, be called jocks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(jock, be called jocks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(jock, be called jocks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(jock, be called jocks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(nerd, is nerds)