jockey: get paid

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents athlete
Weight: 0.60
, time
Weight: 0.50
, brand
Weight: 0.50
, horseman
Weight: 0.49
Siblings boxer
Weight: 0.33
, sprinter
Weight: 0.33
, wrestler
Weight: 0.33
, cyclist
Weight: 0.33
, tennis player
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
get paid 1.00
is is paid 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(athlete, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(jockey, get paid)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(jockey, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(athlete, get paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(jockey, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(athlete, get paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(jockey, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(boxer, get paid)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(athlete, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(jockey, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(jockey, get paid)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(jockey, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(boxer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(boxer, get paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(jockey, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(jockey, get paid)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(jockey, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(jockey, is is paid)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(jockey, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(jockey, is is paid)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(jockey, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(jockey, is is paid)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(jockey, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(jockey, is is paid)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(jockey, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(jockey, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(jockey, get paid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(jockey, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(jockey, get paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(jockey, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(athlete, get paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(jockey, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(boxer, get paid)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(jockey, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(athlete, get paid)