athlete: get paid

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents individual
Weight: 0.63
, artist
Weight: 0.61
, injury
Weight: 0.59
Siblings football player
Weight: 0.80
, hockey player
Weight: 0.79
, wrestler
Weight: 0.78
, tennis player
Weight: 0.78
, gymnast
Weight: 0.76

Related properties

Property Similarity
get paid 1.00
be paid 0.97
is paid 0.96
get paid money 0.94
get paid less 0.93
is paid more 0.93
be paid money 0.91
is paid less 0.89
have pay 0.88
is pay 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(athlete, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(tennis player, be paid)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(athlete, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(football player, is paid)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(athlete, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, get paid)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(athlete, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(football player, get paid)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(athlete, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(football player, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(football player, get paid)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(athlete, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(hockey player, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(hockey player, get paid)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(athlete, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(tennis player, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(tennis player, be paid)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(athlete, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(football player, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(football player, is paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(athlete, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(athlete, get paid)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(athlete, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(athlete, is paid)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(athlete, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(athlete, is paid)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(athlete, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(athlete, be paid money)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(athlete, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(athlete, is paid)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(athlete, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(athlete, be paid money)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(athlete, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(athlete, be paid money)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(athlete, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(athlete, is paid)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(athlete, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(athlete, be paid money)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(athlete, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(athlete, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(athlete, get paid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(athlete, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(athlete, get paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(athlete, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(tennis player, be paid)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(athlete, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(football player, get paid)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(athlete, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(hockey player, get paid)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(athlete, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(football player, is paid)