football player: is paid

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents athlete
Weight: 0.80
, basketball player
Weight: 0.79
, player
Weight: 0.77
, club
Weight: 0.71
Siblings quarterback
Weight: 0.75
, baseball player
Weight: 0.73
, football game
Weight: 0.71
, coach
Weight: 0.64
, linebacker
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
is paid 1.00
get paid 0.96
get paid in war 0.87
get paid more than teachers 0.82
get paid more than real estate angets 0.80
get paid more than soldiers 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(basketball player, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(football player, is paid)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(athlete, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(football player, is paid)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(basketball player, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(football player, is paid)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(athlete, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(football player, is paid)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(football player, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(athlete, is paid)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(football player, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(basketball player, is paid)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(football player, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(athlete, get paid)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(football player, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(basketball player, get paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(football player, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(basketball player, is paid)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(football player, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(basketball player, get paid)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(football player, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(athlete, is paid)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(football player, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(athlete, get paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(football player, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(baseball player, get paid)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(basketball player, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(football player, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(football player, is paid)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(athlete, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(football player, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(football player, is paid)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(basketball player, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(football player, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(football player, is paid)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(athlete, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(football player, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(football player, is paid)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(football player, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(baseball player, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(baseball player, get paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(football player, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(football player, is paid)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(football player, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(football player, get paid)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(football player, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(football player, get paid)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(football player, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(football player, get paid)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(football player, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(football player, get paid in war)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(football player, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(football player, get paid in war)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(football player, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(football player, get paid in war)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(football player, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(football player, get paid more than real estate angets)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(football player, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(football player, get paid more than real estate angets)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(football player, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(football player, get paid more than real estate angets)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(football player, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(football player, get paid in war)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(football player, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(football player, get paid more than real estate angets)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(football player, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(football player, get paid)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(football player, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(football player, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(football player, is paid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(football player, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(football player, is paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(football player, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(athlete, get paid)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(football player, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(athlete, is paid)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(football player, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(basketball player, is paid)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(football player, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(basketball player, get paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(football player, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(baseball player, get paid)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(football player, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(athlete, is paid)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(football player, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(basketball player, is paid)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(football player, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(athlete, get paid)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(football player, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(basketball player, get paid)