basketball player: get paid

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hockey player
Weight: 0.87
, soccer player
Weight: 0.77
, football player
Weight: 0.75
, sport
Weight: 0.72
Siblings baseball player
Weight: 0.81
, boozer
Weight: 0.43
, football game
Weight: 0.40
, football team
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
get paid 1.00
is paid 0.96
get paid more than football 0.85
get paid more than doctors 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(soccer player, get paid)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(basketball player, get paid)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(hockey player, get paid)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(basketball player, get paid)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(football player, get paid)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(basketball player, get paid)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(football player, is paid)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(basketball player, get paid)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(basketball player, get paid)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(football player, get paid)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(basketball player, get paid)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(hockey player, get paid)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(basketball player, get paid)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(soccer player, get paid)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(basketball player, get paid)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(football player, is paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(basketball player, get paid)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(football player, is paid)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(basketball player, get paid)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, get paid)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(basketball player, get paid)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(soccer player, get paid)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(basketball player, get paid)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(football player, get paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(basketball player, get paid)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(baseball player, get paid)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(soccer player, get paid)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(basketball player, get paid)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(basketball player, get paid)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(hockey player, get paid)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(basketball player, get paid)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(basketball player, get paid)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(football player, get paid)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(basketball player, get paid)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(basketball player, get paid)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(football player, is paid)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(basketball player, get paid)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(basketball player, get paid)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(basketball player, get paid)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(baseball player, get paid)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(baseball player, get paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(basketball player, get paid)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(basketball player, get paid)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(basketball player, get paid)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(basketball player, is paid)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(basketball player, get paid)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(basketball player, is paid)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(basketball player, get paid)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(basketball player, is paid)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(basketball player, get paid)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(basketball player, get paid more than football)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(basketball player, get paid)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(basketball player, get paid more than football)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(basketball player, get paid)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(basketball player, get paid more than football)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(basketball player, get paid)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(basketball player, get paid more than football)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(basketball player, get paid)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(basketball player, is paid)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(basketball player, get paid)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(basketball player, get paid)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(basketball player, get paid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(basketball player, get paid)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(basketball player, get paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(basketball player, get paid)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(football player, get paid)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(basketball player, get paid)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(hockey player, get paid)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(basketball player, get paid)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(soccer player, get paid)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(basketball player, get paid)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(football player, is paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(basketball player, get paid)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(baseball player, get paid)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(basketball player, get paid)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(football player, get paid)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(basketball player, get paid)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(hockey player, get paid)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(basketball player, get paid)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(soccer player, get paid)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(basketball player, get paid)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(football player, is paid)