basketball player: get paid more than football

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hockey player
Weight: 0.87
, soccer player
Weight: 0.77
, football player
Weight: 0.75
, sport
Weight: 0.72
Siblings baseball player
Weight: 0.81
, boozer
Weight: 0.43
, football game
Weight: 0.40
, football team
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
get paid more than football 1.00
make more than soccer players 0.87
get paid 0.85
get paid more than doctors 0.85
is paid 0.82
be taller than baseball players 0.77
make more than doctors 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(soccer player, get paid)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(basketball player, get paid more than football)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(hockey player, get paid)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(basketball player, get paid more than football)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(football player, get paid)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(basketball player, get paid more than football)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(football player, is paid)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(basketball player, get paid more than football)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(basketball player, get paid more than football)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(football player, is paid)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(basketball player, get paid more than football)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(football player, get paid)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(basketball player, get paid more than football)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(hockey player, get paid)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(basketball player, get paid more than football)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(soccer player, get paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(basketball player, get paid more than football)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, get paid)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(basketball player, get paid more than football)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(soccer player, get paid)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(basketball player, get paid more than football)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(football player, get paid)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(basketball player, get paid more than football)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(football player, is paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(basketball player, get paid more than football)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(baseball player, get paid)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(soccer player, get paid)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(basketball player, get paid more than football)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(basketball player, get paid more than football)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(hockey player, get paid)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(basketball player, get paid more than football)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(basketball player, get paid more than football)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(football player, get paid)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(basketball player, get paid more than football)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(basketball player, get paid more than football)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(football player, is paid)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(basketball player, get paid more than football)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(basketball player, get paid more than football)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(basketball player, get paid more than football)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(baseball player, get paid)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(baseball player, get paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(basketball player, get paid more than football)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(basketball player, get paid more than football)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(basketball player, get paid more than football)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(basketball player, be taller than baseball players)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(basketball player, get paid more than football)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(basketball player, be taller than baseball players)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(basketball player, get paid more than football)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(basketball player, be taller than baseball players)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(basketball player, get paid more than football)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(basketball player, make more than doctors)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(basketball player, get paid more than football)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(basketball player, make more than doctors)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(basketball player, get paid more than football)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(basketball player, make more than doctors)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(basketball player, get paid more than football)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(basketball player, be taller than baseball players)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(basketball player, get paid more than football)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(basketball player, make more than doctors)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(basketball player, get paid more than football)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(basketball player, is paid)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(basketball player, get paid more than football)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(basketball player, get paid)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(basketball player, get paid more than football)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(basketball player, get paid)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(basketball player, get paid more than football)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(basketball player, is paid)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(basketball player, get paid more than football)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(basketball player, get paid)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(basketball player, get paid more than football)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(basketball player, get paid)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(basketball player, get paid more than football)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(basketball player, is paid)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(basketball player, get paid more than football)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(basketball player, is paid)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(basketball player, get paid more than football)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(basketball player, get paid more than football)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(basketball player, get paid more than football)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(basketball player, get paid more than football)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(basketball player, get paid more than football)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(basketball player, get paid more than football)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(football player, get paid)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(basketball player, get paid more than football)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(hockey player, get paid)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(basketball player, get paid more than football)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(soccer player, get paid)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(basketball player, get paid more than football)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(football player, is paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(basketball player, get paid more than football)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(baseball player, get paid)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(basketball player, get paid more than football)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(football player, get paid)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(basketball player, get paid more than football)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(hockey player, get paid)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(basketball player, get paid more than football)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(soccer player, get paid)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(basketball player, get paid more than football)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(football player, is paid)