athlete: is paid

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents individual
Weight: 0.63
, artist
Weight: 0.61
, injury
Weight: 0.59
Siblings football player
Weight: 0.80
, hockey player
Weight: 0.79
, wrestler
Weight: 0.78
, tennis player
Weight: 0.78
, gymnast
Weight: 0.76

Related properties

Property Similarity
is paid 1.00
be paid 0.99
get paid 0.96
is paid more 0.95
be paid money 0.93
get paid money 0.92
is paid less 0.92
get paid less 0.90
is pay 0.88
have pay 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(athlete, is paid)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(tennis player, be paid)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(athlete, is paid)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(football player, is paid)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(athlete, is paid)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, get paid)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(athlete, is paid)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(football player, get paid)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(athlete, is paid)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(football player, is paid)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(football player, is paid)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(athlete, is paid)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(tennis player, be paid)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(tennis player, be paid)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(athlete, is paid)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(football player, get paid)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(football player, get paid)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(athlete, is paid)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(hockey player, get paid)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(hockey player, get paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(athlete, is paid)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(athlete, is paid)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(athlete, is paid)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(athlete, get paid)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(athlete, is paid)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(athlete, get paid)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(athlete, is paid)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(athlete, be paid money)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(athlete, is paid)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(athlete, get paid)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(athlete, is paid)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(athlete, be paid money)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(athlete, is paid)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(athlete, be paid money)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(athlete, is paid)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(athlete, be paid money)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(athlete, is paid)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(athlete, get paid)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(athlete, is paid)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(athlete, is paid)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(athlete, is paid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(athlete, is paid)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(athlete, is paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(athlete, is paid)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(tennis player, be paid)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(athlete, is paid)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(football player, is paid)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(athlete, is paid)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(football player, get paid)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(athlete, is paid)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(hockey player, get paid)