judge: fine defendant

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activist
Weight: 0.65
, officer
Weight: 0.63
, justice
Weight: 0.61
, trial
Weight: 0.57
Siblings supreme court
Weight: 0.74
, defense attorney
Weight: 0.64
, mayor
Weight: 0.58
, contestant
Weight: 0.53
, lawyer
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
fine defendant 1.00
fine defendent 0.91
judge defendant to be guilty 0.89
clear defendant of all charge 0.88
fine person 0.85
fine criminal 0.85
fine convict criminal 0.85
milk defendant 0.85
fine offender 0.84
fine convict 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(judge, fine defendant)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, milk defendant)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(judge, fine defendant)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(lawyer, milk defendant)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(lawyer, milk defendant)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(judge, fine defendant)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(judge, fine defendant)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(judge, fine defendant)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(judge, fine defendent)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(judge, fine defendant)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(judge, fine offender)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(judge, fine defendant)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(judge, fine defendent)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(judge, fine defendant)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(judge, judge defendant to be guilty)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(judge, fine defendant)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(judge, clear defendant of all charge)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(judge, fine defendant)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(judge, fine person)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(judge, fine defendant)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(judge, judge defendant to be guilty)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(judge, fine defendant)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(judge, clear defendant of all charge)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(judge, fine defendant)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(judge, fine offender)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(judge, fine defendant)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(judge, fine criminal)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(judge, fine defendant)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(judge, fine convict criminal)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(judge, fine defendant)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(judge, fine criminal)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(judge, fine defendant)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(judge, fine person)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(judge, fine defendant)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(judge, fine convict criminal)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(judge, fine defendant)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(judge, fine convict)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(judge, fine defendant)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(judge, fine convict)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(judge, fine defendant)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(judge, fine defendent)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(judge, fine defendant)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(judge, clear defendant of all charge)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(judge, fine defendant)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(judge, fine criminal)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(judge, fine defendant)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(judge, fine person)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(judge, fine defendant)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(judge, clear defendant of all charge)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(judge, fine defendant)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(judge, fine criminal)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(judge, fine defendant)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(judge, fine convict criminal)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(judge, fine defendant)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(judge, judge defendant to be guilty)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(judge, fine defendant)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(judge, fine offender)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(judge, fine defendant)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(judge, judge defendant to be guilty)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(judge, fine defendant)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(judge, fine convict)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(judge, fine defendant)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(judge, fine convict)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(judge, fine defendant)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(judge, fine convict criminal)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(judge, fine defendant)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(judge, fine person)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(judge, fine defendant)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(judge, fine defendent)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(judge, fine defendant)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(judge, fine offender)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(judge, fine defendant)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(judge, fine defendant)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(judge, fine defendant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(judge, fine defendant)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(judge, fine defendant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(judge, fine defendant)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(lawyer, milk defendant)