jukebox: be at bar

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.56
, machine
Weight: 0.51
, device
Weight: 0.49
, artifact
Weight: 0.45
, item
Weight: 0.44
Siblings bar
Weight: 0.32
, dvd player
Weight: 0.32
, stereo
Weight: 0.32
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.31
, fax machine
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at bar 1.00
be at nightclub 0.80
be at restaurant 0.79
be at cafe 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(jukebox, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(bar, be at nightclub)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(jukebox, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(bar, be at restaurant)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(jukebox, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(bar, be at nightclub) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(bar, be at nightclub)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(jukebox, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(bar, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(bar, be at restaurant)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(jukebox, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(jukebox, be at bar)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(jukebox, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(jukebox, be at cafe)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(jukebox, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(jukebox, be at cafe)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(jukebox, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(jukebox, be at cafe)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(jukebox, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(jukebox, be at cafe)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(jukebox, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(jukebox, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(jukebox, be at bar)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(jukebox, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(jukebox, be at bar)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(jukebox, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(bar, be at restaurant)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(jukebox, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(bar, be at nightclub)