junk food: have low nutritional value

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bad food
Weight: 0.81
, food
Weight: 0.74
, thing
Weight: 0.63
, stuff
Weight: 0.63
Siblings fast food
Weight: 0.83
, soda pop
Weight: 0.73
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.70
, chocolate bar
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
have low nutritional value 1.00
have nutritional value 0.98
have low value 0.84
have value 0.79
be high in calories 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(junk food, have low nutritional value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be high in calories)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(junk food, have low nutritional value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(fast food, be high in calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(fast food, be high in calories)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(junk food, have low nutritional value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(junk food, have low nutritional value)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(junk food, have low nutritional value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(junk food, have nutritional value)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(junk food, have low nutritional value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(junk food, have nutritional value)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(junk food, have low nutritional value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(junk food, have nutritional value)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(junk food, have low nutritional value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(junk food, have low value)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(junk food, have low nutritional value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(junk food, have value)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(junk food, have low nutritional value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(junk food, have low value)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(junk food, have low nutritional value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(junk food, be high in calories)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(junk food, have low nutritional value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(junk food, have low value)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(junk food, have low nutritional value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(junk food, have value)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(junk food, have low nutritional value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(junk food, have value)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(junk food, have low nutritional value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(junk food, be high in calories)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(junk food, have low nutritional value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(junk food, have low value)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(junk food, have low nutritional value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(junk food, be high in calories)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(junk food, have low nutritional value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(junk food, have value)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(junk food, have low nutritional value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(junk food, have nutritional value)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(junk food, have low nutritional value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be high in calories)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(junk food, have low nutritional value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(junk food, have low nutritional value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(junk food, have low nutritional value)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(junk food, have low nutritional value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(junk food, have low nutritional value)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(junk food, have low nutritional value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(fast food, be high in calories)