junk food: have nutritional value

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bad food
Weight: 0.81
, food
Weight: 0.74
, thing
Weight: 0.63
, stuff
Weight: 0.63
Siblings fast food
Weight: 0.83
, soda pop
Weight: 0.73
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.70
, chocolate bar
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
have nutritional value 1.00
have low nutritional value 0.98
have value 0.81
have low value 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(junk food, have nutritional value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(junk food, have nutritional value)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(junk food, have nutritional value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(junk food, have low nutritional value)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(junk food, have nutritional value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(junk food, have value)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(junk food, have nutritional value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(junk food, have low nutritional value)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(junk food, have nutritional value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(junk food, have low value)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(junk food, have nutritional value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(junk food, have value)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(junk food, have nutritional value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(junk food, have low value)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(junk food, have nutritional value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(junk food, have value)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(junk food, have nutritional value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(junk food, have low nutritional value)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(junk food, have nutritional value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(junk food, have value)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(junk food, have nutritional value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(junk food, have low value)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(junk food, have nutritional value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(junk food, have low nutritional value)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(junk food, have nutritional value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(junk food, have low value)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(junk food, have nutritional value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(junk food, have nutritional value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(junk food, have nutritional value)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(junk food, have nutritional value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(junk food, have nutritional value)