kamikaze: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents unit
Weight: 0.44
, cocktail
Weight: 0.42
, shot
Weight: 0.37
, drink
Weight: 0.36
, slide
Weight: 0.35
Siblings cavalry
Weight: 0.28
, battalion
Weight: 0.28
, brigade
Weight: 0.28
, squadron
Weight: 0.28
, special force
Weight: 0.27

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality system 0.82
has quality standard 0.81
be bad for health 0.81
taste bad 0.80
be bad for us 0.80
taste good 0.77
get bad reviews 0.76
be bad for body 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(drink, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(kamikaze, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(cocktail, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(kamikaze, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(drink, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(kamikaze, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(unit, has quality standard)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(kamikaze, has quality bad)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(drink, be bad for health)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(kamikaze, has quality bad)
...

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(kamikaze, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(drink, be bad for health)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(kamikaze, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(cocktail, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(kamikaze, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(drink, be bad for body)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(kamikaze, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(drink, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(kamikaze, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(unit, has quality standard)
...

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(kamikaze, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(drink, be bad for health)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(kamikaze, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(drink, be bad for body)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(kamikaze, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(drink, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(kamikaze, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(cocktail, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(kamikaze, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(drink, taste bad)
...

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(kamikaze, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(brigade, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(kamikaze, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(brigade, has quality system)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(drink, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(kamikaze, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(kamikaze, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(cocktail, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(kamikaze, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(kamikaze, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(unit, has quality standard)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(kamikaze, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(kamikaze, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(drink, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(kamikaze, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(kamikaze, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(drink, be bad for health)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(kamikaze, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(kamikaze, has quality bad)
...

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(kamikaze, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(brigade, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(brigade, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(kamikaze, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(brigade, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(brigade, has quality system)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(kamikaze, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(kamikaze, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(kamikaze, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(kamikaze, has quality good)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(kamikaze, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(kamikaze, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(kamikaze, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(kamikaze, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(kamikaze, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(kamikaze, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(kamikaze, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(kamikaze, get bad reviews)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(kamikaze, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(kamikaze, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(kamikaze, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(kamikaze, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(kamikaze, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(kamikaze, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(drink, be bad for health)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(kamikaze, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(drink, be bad for body)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(kamikaze, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(cocktail, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(kamikaze, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(unit, has quality standard)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(kamikaze, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(drink, has quality good)
...

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(kamikaze, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(brigade, has quality system)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(kamikaze, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(brigade, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(kamikaze, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(cocktail, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(kamikaze, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(drink, be bad for health)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(kamikaze, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(drink, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(kamikaze, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(drink, be bad for body)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(kamikaze, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(unit, has quality standard)
...