ketchup: be bad on hot dogs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents flavor
Weight: 0.62
, item
Weight: 0.62
, food
Weight: 0.62
, vegetable
Weight: 0.62
Siblings tomato sauce
Weight: 0.37
, spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.36
, tomato juice
Weight: 0.36
, meat pie
Weight: 0.36
, apple sauce
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad on hot dogs 1.00
be on hot dog bad 0.98
be on hot dog 0.95
be bad on dogs 0.95
be bad for dogs 0.94
be on dog bad 0.91
be on dog 0.85
go bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(food, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(ketchup, be bad on hot dogs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(ketchup, be bad on hot dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(food, go bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(ketchup, be bad on hot dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(food, go bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(ketchup, be bad on hot dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(tomato sauce, be bad for dogs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(food, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(ketchup, be bad on hot dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(ketchup, be bad on hot dogs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(ketchup, be bad on hot dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(tomato sauce, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(tomato sauce, be bad for dogs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(ketchup, be bad on hot dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(ketchup, be bad on hot dogs)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(ketchup, be bad on hot dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(ketchup, be on hot dog bad)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(ketchup, be bad on hot dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(ketchup, be on hot dog bad)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(ketchup, be bad on hot dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(ketchup, be on hot dog bad)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(ketchup, be bad on hot dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(ketchup, be on hot dog)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(ketchup, be bad on hot dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(ketchup, be bad for dogs)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(ketchup, be bad on hot dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(ketchup, be on hot dog)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(ketchup, be bad on hot dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(ketchup, be bad for dogs)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(ketchup, be bad on hot dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(ketchup, be on hot dog)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(ketchup, be bad on hot dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(ketchup, be on hot dog)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(ketchup, be bad on hot dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(ketchup, be on dog)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(ketchup, be bad on hot dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(ketchup, be bad for dogs)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(ketchup, be bad on hot dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(ketchup, be on hot dog bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(ketchup, be bad on hot dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(ketchup, go bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(ketchup, be bad on hot dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(ketchup, go bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(ketchup, be bad on hot dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(ketchup, go bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(ketchup, be bad on hot dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(ketchup, be on dog)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(ketchup, be bad on hot dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(ketchup, be bad for dogs)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(ketchup, be bad on hot dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(ketchup, be on dog)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(ketchup, be bad on hot dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(ketchup, go bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(ketchup, be bad on hot dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(ketchup, be on dog)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(ketchup, be bad on hot dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(ketchup, be bad on hot dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(ketchup, be bad on hot dogs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(ketchup, be bad on hot dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(ketchup, be bad on hot dogs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(ketchup, be bad on hot dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(food, go bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(ketchup, be bad on hot dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(tomato sauce, be bad for dogs)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(ketchup, be bad on hot dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(food, go bad)