ketchup: be on hot dog

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents flavor
Weight: 0.62
, item
Weight: 0.62
, food
Weight: 0.62
, vegetable
Weight: 0.62
Siblings tomato sauce
Weight: 0.37
, spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.36
, tomato juice
Weight: 0.36
, meat pie
Weight: 0.36
, apple sauce
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be on hot dog 1.00
be on hot dog bad 0.98
be bad on hot dogs 0.95
be on dog 0.93
be on dog bad 0.92
be bad on dogs 0.89
be bad for dogs 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(ketchup, be on hot dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(tomato sauce, be bad for dogs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(ketchup, be on hot dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(tomato sauce, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(tomato sauce, be bad for dogs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(ketchup, be on hot dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(ketchup, be on hot dog)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(ketchup, be on hot dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(ketchup, be on hot dog bad)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(ketchup, be on hot dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(ketchup, be bad on hot dogs)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(ketchup, be on hot dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(ketchup, be bad on hot dogs)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(ketchup, be on hot dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(ketchup, be bad on hot dogs)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(ketchup, be on hot dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(ketchup, be on hot dog bad)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(ketchup, be on hot dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(ketchup, be on hot dog bad)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(ketchup, be on hot dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(ketchup, be on dog)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(ketchup, be on hot dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(ketchup, be bad for dogs)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(ketchup, be on hot dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(ketchup, be bad for dogs)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(ketchup, be on hot dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(ketchup, be bad on hot dogs)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(ketchup, be on hot dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(ketchup, be on dog)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(ketchup, be on hot dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(ketchup, be on hot dog bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(ketchup, be on hot dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(ketchup, be bad for dogs)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(ketchup, be on hot dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(ketchup, be on dog)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(ketchup, be on hot dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(ketchup, be bad for dogs)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(ketchup, be on hot dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(ketchup, be on dog)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(ketchup, be on hot dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(ketchup, be on hot dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(ketchup, be on hot dog)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(ketchup, be on hot dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(ketchup, be on hot dog)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(ketchup, be on hot dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(tomato sauce, be bad for dogs)