kidney: respond to increased intake of water

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents urinary tract
Weight: 0.66
, complication
Weight: 0.66
, body part
Weight: 0.66
, organ
Weight: 0.64
Siblings kidney stone
Weight: 0.72
, hemolytic anemia
Weight: 0.64
, diabetes
Weight: 0.64
, liver
Weight: 0.62
, pyelonephritis
Weight: 0.41

Related properties

Property Similarity
respond to increased intake of water 1.00
respond to increased intake of salt 0.97
respond to intake of water 0.96
respond to intake 0.95
respond to intake of salt 0.92
adapt to increase in activity 0.79
adapt to increase in physical activity 0.78
increased in size 0.78
be on increase 0.77
decreased in size 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(organ, adapt to increase in physical activity)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(kidney, respond to increased intake of water)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(kidney, respond to increased intake of water)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(organ, adapt to increase in physical activity)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(kidney, respond to increased intake of water)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(organ, adapt to increase in physical activity)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(kidney, respond to increased intake of water)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(liver, increased in size)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(organ, adapt to increase in physical activity)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(kidney, respond to increased intake of water)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(kidney, respond to increased intake of water)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(kidney, respond to increased intake of water)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(liver, increased in size)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(liver, increased in size)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(kidney, respond to increased intake of water)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(kidney, respond to increased intake of water)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(kidney, respond to increased intake of water)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(kidney, respond to increased intake of salt)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(kidney, respond to increased intake of water)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(kidney, respond to increased intake of salt)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(kidney, respond to increased intake of water)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(kidney, respond to increased intake of salt)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(kidney, respond to increased intake of water)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(kidney, respond to increased intake of salt)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(kidney, respond to increased intake of water)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(kidney, decreased in size)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(kidney, respond to increased intake of water)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(kidney, decreased in size)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(kidney, respond to increased intake of water)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(kidney, decreased in size)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(kidney, respond to increased intake of water)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(kidney, decreased in size)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(kidney, respond to increased intake of water)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(kidney, respond to increased intake of water)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(kidney, respond to increased intake of water)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(kidney, respond to increased intake of water)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(kidney, respond to increased intake of water)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(kidney, respond to increased intake of water)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(organ, adapt to increase in physical activity)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(kidney, respond to increased intake of water)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(liver, increased in size)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(kidney, respond to increased intake of water)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(organ, adapt to increase in physical activity)