liver: increased in size

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tissue
Weight: 0.64
, organ
Weight: 0.62
, kidney
Weight: 0.62
, complication
Weight: 0.61
, gland
Weight: 0.59
Siblings cirrhosis
Weight: 0.61
, liver cancer
Weight: 0.38
, bone tissue
Weight: 0.37
, bone marrow
Weight: 0.37
, adrenal gland
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
increased in size 1.00
respond to increased intake 0.79
respond to increased intake of water 0.78
adapt to increase in physical activity 0.77
adapt to increase in activity 0.77
have large amount 0.77
respond to increased intake of salt 0.76
adapt to increase 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(organ, adapt to increase in physical activity)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(liver, increased in size)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(kidney, respond to increased intake of water)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(liver, increased in size)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(kidney, respond to increased intake of salt)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(liver, increased in size)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(liver, increased in size)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(kidney, respond to increased intake of salt)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(liver, increased in size)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(kidney, respond to increased intake of water)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(liver, increased in size)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(organ, adapt to increase in physical activity)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(liver, increased in size)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(kidney, respond to increased intake of salt)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(liver, increased in size)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(kidney, respond to increased intake of water)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(liver, increased in size)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(organ, adapt to increase in physical activity)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(kidney, respond to increased intake of water)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(liver, increased in size)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(liver, increased in size)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(organ, adapt to increase in physical activity)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(liver, increased in size)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(liver, increased in size)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(kidney, respond to increased intake of salt)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(liver, increased in size)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(liver, increased in size)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(liver, increased in size)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(liver, increased in size)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(liver, increased in size)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(liver, increased in size)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(liver, increased in size)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(liver, increased in size)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(liver, increased in size)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(liver, increased in size)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(organ, adapt to increase in physical activity)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(liver, increased in size)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(kidney, respond to increased intake of water)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(liver, increased in size)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(kidney, respond to increased intake of salt)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(liver, increased in size)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(organ, adapt to increase in physical activity)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(liver, increased in size)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(kidney, respond to increased intake of water)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(liver, increased in size)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(kidney, respond to increased intake of salt)