kissing: be in relationship

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.62
, scene
Weight: 0.56
, act
Weight: 0.55
, behavior
Weight: 0.53
Siblings kiss
Weight: 0.36
, sexual intercourse
Weight: 0.36
, masturbation
Weight: 0.35
, sex
Weight: 0.34
, sexual assault
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in relationship 1.00
be for relationship 0.99
be important in relationship 0.97
very is important in relationships 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(kissing, be in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(sexual intercourse, be important in relationship)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(kissing, be in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(kiss, be important in relationship)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(kissing, be in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(sex, be important in relationship)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(kissing, be in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(sex, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(sex, be important in relationship)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(kissing, be in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(kiss, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(kiss, be important in relationship)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(kissing, be in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(sexual intercourse, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(sexual intercourse, be important in relationship)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(kissing, be in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(kissing, be in relationship)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(kissing, be in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(kissing, be for relationship)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(kissing, be in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(kissing, be for relationship)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(kissing, be in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(kissing, be important in relationship)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(kissing, be in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(kissing, be important in relationship)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(kissing, be in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(kissing, very is important in relationships)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(kissing, be in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(kissing, be for relationship)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(kissing, be in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(kissing, very is important in relationships)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(kissing, be in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(kissing, be important in relationship)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(kissing, be in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(kissing, be for relationship)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(kissing, be in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(kissing, be important in relationship)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(kissing, be in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(kissing, very is important in relationships)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(kissing, be in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(kissing, very is important in relationships)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(kissing, be in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(kissing, be in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(kissing, be in relationship)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(kissing, be in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(kissing, be in relationship)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(kissing, be in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(kiss, be important in relationship)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(kissing, be in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(sex, be important in relationship)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(kissing, be in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(sexual intercourse, be important in relationship)