knife: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.74
, swiss army knife
Weight: 0.69
, cooking utensil
Weight: 0.65
, weapon
Weight: 0.64
Siblings butter knife
Weight: 0.77
, pocket knife
Weight: 0.73
, cleaver
Weight: 0.65
, pocket
Weight: 0.59
, dagger
Weight: 0.55

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality worse 0.87
has quality use 0.86
be good 0.82
has quality worth 0.82
be good on lucian 0.81
has quality news 0.80
is terrible 0.77
has quality effects 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(swiss army knife, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(knife, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(weapon, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(knife, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(knife, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(weapon, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(knife, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(cooking utensil, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(knife, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(cooking utensil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(knife, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(knife, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(cooking utensil, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(knife, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(weapon, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(knife, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(cooking utensil, has quality use)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(knife, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(weapon, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(knife, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(swiss army knife, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(knife, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(weapon, be good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(knife, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(cooking utensil, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(knife, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(weapon, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(knife, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(weapon, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(knife, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(swiss army knife, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(knife, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(weapon, be good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(knife, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(cooking utensil, has quality use)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(knife, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(dagger, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(knife, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(cleaver, be good on lucian)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(knife, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cleaver, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(knife, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(dagger, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(knife, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pocket, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(knife, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(dagger, has quality worth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(swiss army knife, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(knife, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(knife, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(weapon, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(knife, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(knife, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(weapon, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(knife, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(knife, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(knife, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(knife, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(cooking utensil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(knife, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(knife, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(cooking utensil, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(knife, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(knife, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(knife, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(pocket, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(pocket, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(knife, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(dagger, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(dagger, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(knife, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(dagger, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(dagger, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(knife, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(cleaver, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(cleaver, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(knife, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(dagger, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(dagger, has quality worth)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(knife, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(cleaver, be good on lucian) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(cleaver, be good on lucian)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(knife, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(knife, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(knife, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(knife, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(knife, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(knife, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(knife, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(knife, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(knife, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(knife, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(knife, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(knife, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(knife, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(knife, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(knife, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(knife, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(cooking utensil, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(knife, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(cooking utensil, has quality use)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(knife, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(weapon, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(knife, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(weapon, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(knife, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(swiss army knife, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(knife, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(weapon, be good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(knife, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(dagger, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(knife, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(pocket, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(knife, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(dagger, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(knife, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(cleaver, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(knife, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(cleaver, be good on lucian)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(knife, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(dagger, has quality worth)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(knife, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(cooking utensil, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(knife, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(weapon, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(knife, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(cooking utensil, has quality use)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(knife, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(weapon, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(knife, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(swiss army knife, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(knife, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(weapon, be good)