cooking utensil: has quality use

Related concepts

Parents	utensil Weight: 0.76 , frying pan Weight: 0.75 , item Weight: 0.68 , necessity Weight: 0.63 , thing Weight: 0.63
Siblings	wooden spoon Weight: 0.78 , toaster oven Weight: 0.76 , spoon Weight: 0.70 , wok Weight: 0.65 , coffee maker Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality use	1.00
has quality bad	0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(utensil, has quality use) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(cooking utensil, has quality use)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(utensil, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(cooking utensil, has quality use)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(cooking utensil, has quality use) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(utensil, has quality use)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(cooking utensil, has quality use) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(utensil, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(cooking utensil, has quality use) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(utensil, has quality bad)

0.17

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(cooking utensil, has quality use) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(utensil, has quality use)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(cooking utensil, has quality use) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(wooden spoon, has quality bad)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(cooking utensil, has quality use) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(spoon, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(utensil, has quality use) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(cooking utensil, has quality use) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(cooking utensil, has quality use)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(utensil, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(cooking utensil, has quality use) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(cooking utensil, has quality use)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(cooking utensil, has quality use) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

Remarkable(wooden spoon, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Plausible(wooden spoon, has quality bad)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(cooking utensil, has quality use) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

Remarkable(spoon, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Plausible(spoon, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(cooking utensil, has quality use) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Salient(cooking utensil, has quality use)

Similarity expansion

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(cooking utensil, has quality use) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Remarkable(cooking utensil, has quality bad)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.70

Salient(cooking utensil, has quality use) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Salient(cooking utensil, has quality bad)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(cooking utensil, has quality use) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Plausible(cooking utensil, has quality bad)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.34

Typical(cooking utensil, has quality use) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(cooking utensil, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.70

Salient(cooking utensil, has quality use) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(cooking utensil, has quality use) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(cooking utensil, has quality use)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(cooking utensil, has quality use) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(cooking utensil, has quality use)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(cooking utensil, has quality use) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(utensil, has quality use)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(cooking utensil, has quality use) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(utensil, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(cooking utensil, has quality use) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(wooden spoon, has quality bad)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(cooking utensil, has quality use) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(spoon, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.34

Typical(cooking utensil, has quality use) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(utensil, has quality use)

0.17

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.34

Typical(cooking utensil, has quality use) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(utensil, has quality bad)