knife: have edges

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.74
, swiss army knife
Weight: 0.69
, cooking utensil
Weight: 0.65
, weapon
Weight: 0.64
Siblings butter knife
Weight: 0.77
, pocket knife
Weight: 0.73
, cleaver
Weight: 0.65
, pocket
Weight: 0.59
, dagger
Weight: 0.55

Related properties

Property Similarity
have edges 1.00
have sharp edges 0.92
have serrated edges 0.87
has physical part ridges 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(knife, have edges)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(knife, have edges)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(knife, have edges)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(knife, have sharp edges)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(knife, have edges)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(knife, have serrated edges)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(knife, have edges)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(knife, have sharp edges)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(knife, have edges)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(knife, have serrated edges)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(knife, have edges)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(knife, have serrated edges)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(knife, have edges)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(knife, have serrated edges)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(knife, have edges)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(knife, has physical part ridges)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(knife, have edges)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(knife, have sharp edges)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(knife, have edges)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(knife, have sharp edges)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(knife, have edges)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(knife, has physical part ridges)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(knife, have edges)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(knife, has physical part ridges)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(knife, have edges)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(knife, has physical part ridges)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(knife, have edges)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(knife, have edges)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(knife, have edges)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(knife, have edges)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(knife, have edges)