knife: has physical part ridges

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.74
, swiss army knife
Weight: 0.69
, cooking utensil
Weight: 0.65
, weapon
Weight: 0.64
Siblings butter knife
Weight: 0.77
, pocket knife
Weight: 0.73
, cleaver
Weight: 0.65
, pocket
Weight: 0.59
, dagger
Weight: 0.55

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part ridges 1.00
have serrated edges 0.78
has physical part blades 0.77
has physical part grooves 0.77
has physical part holes 0.77
have edges 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(knife, has physical part ridges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(butter knife, has physical part grooves)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(knife, has physical part ridges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(pocket knife, has physical part blades)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(knife, has physical part ridges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(pocket knife, has physical part blades) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(pocket knife, has physical part blades)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(knife, has physical part ridges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(butter knife, has physical part grooves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(butter knife, has physical part grooves)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(knife, has physical part ridges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(knife, has physical part ridges)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(knife, has physical part ridges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(knife, have serrated edges)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(knife, has physical part ridges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(knife, have edges)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(knife, has physical part ridges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(knife, have serrated edges)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(knife, has physical part ridges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(knife, have serrated edges)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(knife, has physical part ridges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(knife, have edges)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(knife, has physical part ridges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(knife, have edges)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(knife, has physical part ridges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(knife, has physical part holes)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(knife, has physical part ridges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(knife, has physical part holes)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(knife, has physical part ridges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(knife, has physical part holes)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(knife, has physical part ridges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(knife, has physical part grooves)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(knife, has physical part ridges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(knife, have serrated edges)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(knife, has physical part ridges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(knife, has physical part holes)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(knife, has physical part ridges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(knife, has physical part grooves)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(knife, has physical part ridges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(knife, has physical part grooves)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(knife, has physical part ridges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(knife, has physical part grooves)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(knife, has physical part ridges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(knife, have edges)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(knife, has physical part ridges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(knife, has physical part ridges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(knife, has physical part ridges)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(knife, has physical part ridges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(knife, has physical part ridges)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(knife, has physical part ridges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(pocket knife, has physical part blades)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(knife, has physical part ridges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(butter knife, has physical part grooves)