pocket knife: has physical part blades

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pocket
Weight: 0.79
, knife
Weight: 0.73
, weapon
Weight: 0.70
, item
Weight: 0.65
Siblings butter knife
Weight: 0.40
, pocket watch
Weight: 0.40
, swiss army knife
Weight: 0.38
, submachine gun
Weight: 0.38
, handgun
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part blades 1.00
have two blades 0.93
have multiple blades 0.91
have holes in blade 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(pocket knife, has physical part blades)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(swiss army knife, have two blades)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(pocket knife, has physical part blades)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(swiss army knife, have two blades)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(swiss army knife, have two blades)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(pocket knife, has physical part blades)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(pocket knife, has physical part blades)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(pocket knife, has physical part blades)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(pocket knife, have multiple blades)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(pocket knife, has physical part blades)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(pocket knife, have two blades)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(pocket knife, has physical part blades)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(pocket knife, have two blades)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(pocket knife, has physical part blades)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(pocket knife, have two blades)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(pocket knife, has physical part blades)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(pocket knife, have two blades)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(pocket knife, has physical part blades)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(pocket knife, have multiple blades)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(pocket knife, has physical part blades)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(pocket knife, have holes in blade)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(pocket knife, has physical part blades)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(pocket knife, have holes in blade)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(pocket knife, has physical part blades)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(pocket knife, have multiple blades)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(pocket knife, has physical part blades)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(pocket knife, have holes in blade)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(pocket knife, has physical part blades)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(pocket knife, have holes in blade)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(pocket knife, has physical part blades)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(pocket knife, have multiple blades)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(pocket knife, has physical part blades)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(pocket knife, has physical part blades)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(pocket knife, has physical part blades)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(pocket knife, has physical part blades)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(pocket knife, has physical part blades)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(pocket knife, has physical part blades)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(swiss army knife, have two blades)