pocket knife: have holes in blade

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pocket
Weight: 0.79
, knife
Weight: 0.73
, weapon
Weight: 0.70
, item
Weight: 0.65
Siblings butter knife
Weight: 0.40
, pocket watch
Weight: 0.40
, swiss army knife
Weight: 0.38
, submachine gun
Weight: 0.38
, handgun
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
have holes in blade 1.00
have two blades 0.86
has physical part blades 0.85
have multiple blades 0.84
have holes in them 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(knife, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(pocket knife, have holes in blade)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pocket knife, have holes in blade)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(knife, have holes in them)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(pocket knife, have holes in blade)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(knife, have holes in them)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(pocket knife, have holes in blade)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(swiss army knife, have two blades)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(knife, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(pocket knife, have holes in blade)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(pocket knife, have holes in blade)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pocket knife, have holes in blade)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(swiss army knife, have two blades)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(swiss army knife, have two blades)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pocket knife, have holes in blade)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(pocket knife, have holes in blade)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(pocket knife, have holes in blade)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(pocket knife, have multiple blades)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(pocket knife, have holes in blade)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(pocket knife, have two blades)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(pocket knife, have holes in blade)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(pocket knife, have two blades)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pocket knife, have holes in blade)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(pocket knife, have two blades)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(pocket knife, have holes in blade)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(pocket knife, have holes in them)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(pocket knife, have holes in blade)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(pocket knife, has physical part blades)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(pocket knife, have holes in blade)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(pocket knife, have multiple blades)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(pocket knife, have holes in blade)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(pocket knife, have two blades)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(pocket knife, have holes in blade)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(pocket knife, has physical part blades)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(pocket knife, have holes in blade)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(pocket knife, have multiple blades)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pocket knife, have holes in blade)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(pocket knife, has physical part blades)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(pocket knife, have holes in blade)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(pocket knife, have holes in them)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(pocket knife, have holes in blade)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(pocket knife, has physical part blades)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pocket knife, have holes in blade)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(pocket knife, have holes in them)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(pocket knife, have holes in blade)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(pocket knife, have holes in them)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pocket knife, have holes in blade)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(pocket knife, have multiple blades)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(pocket knife, have holes in blade)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(pocket knife, have holes in blade)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(pocket knife, have holes in blade)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pocket knife, have holes in blade)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(pocket knife, have holes in blade)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(pocket knife, have holes in blade)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(knife, have holes in them)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(pocket knife, have holes in blade)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(swiss army knife, have two blades)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(pocket knife, have holes in blade)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(knife, have holes in them)