knife: has physical part grooves

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.74
, swiss army knife
Weight: 0.69
, cooking utensil
Weight: 0.65
, weapon
Weight: 0.64
Siblings butter knife
Weight: 0.77
, pocket knife
Weight: 0.73
, cleaver
Weight: 0.65
, pocket
Weight: 0.59
, dagger
Weight: 0.55

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part grooves 1.00
have blood grooves 0.91
has physical part holes 0.77
has physical part ridges 0.77
has physical part hole 0.76
has physical part blades 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(knife, has physical part grooves)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(butter knife, has physical part grooves)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(knife, has physical part grooves)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(cleaver, has physical part hole)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(knife, has physical part grooves)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(pocket knife, has physical part blades)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(knife, has physical part grooves)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(butter knife, has physical part grooves)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(butter knife, has physical part grooves)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(knife, has physical part grooves)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(pocket knife, has physical part blades)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(pocket knife, has physical part blades)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(knife, has physical part grooves)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(cleaver, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(cleaver, has physical part hole)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(knife, has physical part grooves)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(knife, has physical part grooves)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(knife, has physical part grooves)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(knife, have blood grooves)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(knife, has physical part grooves)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(knife, have blood grooves)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(knife, has physical part grooves)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(knife, have blood grooves)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(knife, has physical part grooves)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(knife, have blood grooves)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(knife, has physical part grooves)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(knife, has physical part holes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(knife, has physical part grooves)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(knife, has physical part ridges)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(knife, has physical part grooves)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(knife, has physical part holes)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(knife, has physical part grooves)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(knife, has physical part ridges)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(knife, has physical part grooves)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(knife, has physical part holes)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(knife, has physical part grooves)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(knife, has physical part ridges)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(knife, has physical part grooves)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(knife, has physical part ridges)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(knife, has physical part grooves)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(knife, has physical part holes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(knife, has physical part grooves)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(knife, has physical part grooves)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(knife, has physical part grooves)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(knife, has physical part grooves)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(knife, has physical part grooves)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(knife, has physical part grooves)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(pocket knife, has physical part blades)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(knife, has physical part grooves)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(butter knife, has physical part grooves)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(knife, has physical part grooves)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(cleaver, has physical part hole)