knife: is more expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.74
, swiss army knife
Weight: 0.69
, cooking utensil
Weight: 0.65
, weapon
Weight: 0.64
Siblings butter knife
Weight: 0.77
, pocket knife
Weight: 0.73
, cleaver
Weight: 0.65
, pocket
Weight: 0.59
, dagger
Weight: 0.55

Related properties

Property Similarity
is more expensive 1.00
is expensive 0.94
is expensive csgo 0.94
be in csgo expensive 0.94
is damn expensive 0.82
is more effective 0.80
be more hazardous than conventional weapons 0.78
is cheap 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(swiss army knife, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(knife, is more expensive)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(knife, is more expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(knife, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(swiss army knife, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(knife, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(knife, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(swiss army knife, is expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(knife, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(knife, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pocket knife, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(knife, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(pocket, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(knife, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(cleaver, is more effective)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(knife, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pocket, is damn expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(swiss army knife, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(knife, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(knife, is more expensive)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(knife, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(knife, is more expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(knife, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(pocket, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(pocket, is expensive)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(knife, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(pocket knife, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(pocket knife, is expensive)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(knife, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(pocket, is damn expensive)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(pocket, is damn expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(knife, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(cleaver, is more effective)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(cleaver, is more effective)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(knife, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(knife, is more expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(knife, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(knife, is expensive)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(knife, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(knife, is expensive)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(knife, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(knife, is expensive)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(knife, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(knife, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(knife, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(knife, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(knife, is more expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(knife, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(knife, is more expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(knife, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(swiss army knife, is expensive)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(knife, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(knife, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(pocket knife, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(knife, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(pocket, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(knife, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(pocket, is damn expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(knife, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(cleaver, is more effective)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(knife, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(swiss army knife, is expensive)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(knife, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons)