weapon: be more hazardous than conventional weapons

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tool
Weight: 0.62
, thing
Weight: 0.62
, accessory
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.59
Siblings chemical weapon
Weight: 0.86
, biological weapon
Weight: 0.86
, submachine gun
Weight: 0.82
, assault rifle
Weight: 0.73
, machine gun
Weight: 0.73

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more hazardous than conventional weapons 1.00
be much more destructive than traditional explosives 0.87
be much more destructive than explosives 0.84
be different from atomic bombs used in world war 2 0.77
be different from bombs used in world war 2 0.76
be different from atomic bombs used 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(weapon, be different from atomic bombs used in world war 2)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(weapon, be different from atomic bombs used in world war 2)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(weapon, be different from atomic bombs used in world war 2)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(weapon, be different from atomic bombs used in world war 2)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons)