weapon: be much more destructive than traditional explosives

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tool
Weight: 0.62
, thing
Weight: 0.62
, accessory
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.59
Siblings chemical weapon
Weight: 0.86
, biological weapon
Weight: 0.86
, submachine gun
Weight: 0.82
, assault rifle
Weight: 0.73
, machine gun
Weight: 0.73

Related properties

Property Similarity
be much more destructive than traditional explosives 1.00
be much more destructive than explosives 0.98
be more hazardous than conventional weapons 0.87
be different from bombs used 0.81
be different from bombs 0.81
be different from bombs used in world war 2 0.80
be different from atomic bombs used 0.79
compare to bombs used 0.78
be different from atomic bombs used in world war 2 0.78
compare to bombs used in world war 2 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(weapon, be different from atomic bombs used in world war 2)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(weapon, be different from atomic bombs used in world war 2)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(weapon, be different from atomic bombs used in world war 2)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(weapon, compare to bombs used in world war 2)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(weapon, be different from atomic bombs used in world war 2)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(weapon, compare to bombs used in world war 2)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(weapon, compare to bombs used in world war 2)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(weapon, compare to bombs used in world war 2)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives)