knowledge: be gain through experience

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents weapon
Weight: 0.64
, attribute
Weight: 0.64
, force
Weight: 0.63
, quality
Weight: 0.62
, benefit
Weight: 0.62
Siblings experience
Weight: 0.35
, intellect
Weight: 0.34
, passion
Weight: 0.34
, enthusiasm
Weight: 0.33
, wealth
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be gain through experience 1.00
be gain 0.87
wants to gain more land 0.79
increase knowledge 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(knowledge, be gain through experience)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(experience, be gain)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(knowledge, be gain through experience)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(experience, increase knowledge)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(knowledge, be gain through experience)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(experience, increase knowledge)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(experience, increase knowledge)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(knowledge, be gain through experience)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(experience, be gain)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(experience, be gain)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(knowledge, be gain through experience)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(knowledge, be gain through experience)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(knowledge, be gain through experience)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(knowledge, wants to gain more land)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(knowledge, be gain through experience)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(knowledge, wants to gain more land)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(knowledge, be gain through experience)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(knowledge, wants to gain more land)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(knowledge, be gain through experience)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(knowledge, wants to gain more land)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(knowledge, be gain through experience)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(knowledge, be gain through experience)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(knowledge, be gain through experience)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(knowledge, be gain through experience)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(knowledge, be gain through experience)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(knowledge, be gain through experience)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(experience, increase knowledge)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(knowledge, be gain through experience)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(experience, be gain)