knowledge: wants to gain more land

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents weapon
Weight: 0.64
, attribute
Weight: 0.64
, force
Weight: 0.63
, quality
Weight: 0.62
, benefit
Weight: 0.62
Siblings experience
Weight: 0.35
, intellect
Weight: 0.34
, passion
Weight: 0.34
, enthusiasm
Weight: 0.33
, wealth
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
wants to gain more land 1.00
be gain 0.84
be gain through experience 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(knowledge, wants to gain more land) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(experience, be gain)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(knowledge, wants to gain more land) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(experience, be gain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(experience, be gain)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(knowledge, wants to gain more land) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(knowledge, wants to gain more land)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(knowledge, wants to gain more land) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(knowledge, be gain through experience)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(knowledge, wants to gain more land) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(knowledge, be gain through experience)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(knowledge, wants to gain more land) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(knowledge, be gain through experience)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(knowledge, wants to gain more land) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(knowledge, be gain through experience)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(knowledge, wants to gain more land) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(knowledge, wants to gain more land) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(knowledge, wants to gain more land)

Typical implies Plausible

0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(knowledge, wants to gain more land) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(knowledge, wants to gain more land)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(knowledge, wants to gain more land) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(experience, be gain)