ko: is phi phi for filmmaking

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.52
, forum
Weight: 0.44
, blog
Weight: 0.43
, pair
Weight: 0.41
, site
Weight: 0.41
Siblings nasa
Weight: 0.32
, santa fe
Weight: 0.31
, monaco
Weight: 0.31
, ga
Weight: 0.31
, venice
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is phi phi for filmmaking 1.00
is phi phi good for filmmaking 1.00
is phi phi 0.93
is phi phi good 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(ko, is phi phi for filmmaking)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(ko, is phi phi for filmmaking)

Similarity expansion

0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(ko, is phi phi for filmmaking)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(ko, is phi phi good for filmmaking)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(ko, is phi phi for filmmaking)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(ko, is phi phi good for filmmaking)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(ko, is phi phi for filmmaking)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(ko, is phi phi)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(ko, is phi phi for filmmaking)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(ko, is phi phi good)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(ko, is phi phi for filmmaking)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(ko, is phi phi)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(ko, is phi phi for filmmaking)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(ko, is phi phi good)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(ko, is phi phi for filmmaking)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(ko, is phi phi good for filmmaking)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(ko, is phi phi for filmmaking)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(ko, is phi phi)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(ko, is phi phi for filmmaking)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(ko, is phi phi good for filmmaking)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(ko, is phi phi for filmmaking)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(ko, is phi phi good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(ko, is phi phi for filmmaking)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(ko, is phi phi good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(ko, is phi phi for filmmaking)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(ko, is phi phi)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(ko, is phi phi for filmmaking)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(ko, is phi phi for filmmaking)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(ko, is phi phi for filmmaking)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(ko, is phi phi for filmmaking)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(ko, is phi phi for filmmaking)