ko: is phi phi good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.52
, forum
Weight: 0.44
, blog
Weight: 0.43
, pair
Weight: 0.41
, site
Weight: 0.41
Siblings nasa
Weight: 0.32
, santa fe
Weight: 0.31
, monaco
Weight: 0.31
, ga
Weight: 0.31
, venice
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is phi phi good 1.00
is phi phi 1.00
is phi phi good for filmmaking 0.93
is phi phi for filmmaking 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(ko, is phi phi good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(ko, is phi phi good)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(ko, is phi phi good)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(ko, is phi phi)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(ko, is phi phi good)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(ko, is phi phi)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(ko, is phi phi good)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(ko, is phi phi)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(ko, is phi phi good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(ko, is phi phi good for filmmaking)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(ko, is phi phi good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(ko, is phi phi for filmmaking)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(ko, is phi phi good)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(ko, is phi phi good for filmmaking)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(ko, is phi phi good)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(ko, is phi phi for filmmaking)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(ko, is phi phi good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(ko, is phi phi good for filmmaking)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(ko, is phi phi good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(ko, is phi phi for filmmaking)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(ko, is phi phi good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(ko, is phi phi good for filmmaking)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(ko, is phi phi good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(ko, is phi phi for filmmaking)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(ko, is phi phi good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(ko, is phi phi)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(ko, is phi phi good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(ko, is phi phi good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(ko, is phi phi good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(ko, is phi phi good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(ko, is phi phi good)