lack: affect population

Related concepts

Parents	factor Weight: 0.64 , reason Weight: 0.61 , ability Weight: 0.61 , symptom Weight: 0.61
Siblings	absence Weight: 0.64 , poor people Weight: 0.60 , apathy Weight: 0.34 , laziness Weight: 0.34 , characteristic Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
affect population	1.00
affect economy	0.79
affect system	0.76
affect life	0.76
affect health	0.76
affect women	0.76
affect children	0.76
affect change	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(factor, affect children) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(lack, affect population)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(factor, affect health) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(lack, affect population)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(lack, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Plausible(factor, affect health)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(lack, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(factor, affect children)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(lack, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(factor, affect children)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(lack, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(factor, affect health)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(lack, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(laziness, affect life)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(factor, affect children) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

Remarkable(lack, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Plausible(lack, affect population)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(factor, affect health) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

Remarkable(lack, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Plausible(lack, affect population)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(lack, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

Remarkable(laziness, affect life) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Plausible(laziness, affect life)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(lack, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Salient(lack, affect population)

Similarity expansion

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(lack, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Typical(lack, affect system)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(lack, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Plausible(lack, affect system)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.52

Remarkable(lack, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(lack, affect women)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.52

Remarkable(lack, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(lack, affect children)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(lack, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(lack, affect health)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.52

Remarkable(lack, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(lack, affect economy)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.46

Salient(lack, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Salient(lack, affect system)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(lack, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Plausible(lack, affect health)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.46

Salient(lack, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Salient(lack, affect health)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(lack, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Plausible(lack, affect economy)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(lack, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(lack, affect economy)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.46

Salient(lack, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Salient(lack, affect economy)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.52

Remarkable(lack, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(lack, affect health)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.52

Remarkable(lack, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(lack, affect system)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.46

Salient(lack, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Salient(lack, affect children)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(lack, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(lack, affect children)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.46

Salient(lack, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Salient(lack, affect women)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(lack, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Plausible(lack, affect women)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(lack, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(lack, affect children)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(lack, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(lack, affect women)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.46

Salient(lack, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(lack, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(lack, affect population)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(lack, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(lack, affect population)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(lack, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(factor, affect health)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(lack, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(factor, affect children)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(lack, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Typical(laziness, affect life)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(lack, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(factor, affect health)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(lack, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(factor, affect children)