lack: look like like other types

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.64
, reason
Weight: 0.61
, ability
Weight: 0.61
, symptom
Weight: 0.61
Siblings absence
Weight: 0.64
, poor people
Weight: 0.60
, apathy
Weight: 0.34
, laziness
Weight: 0.34
, characteristic
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
look like like other types 1.00
look like like types 0.99
be different 0.80
were treated like 0.77
affect differently people 0.77
be seen as bad thing 0.76
be related use examples 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(factor, be different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(lack, look like like other types)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(factor, be related use examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(lack, look like like other types)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(lack, look like like other types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(factor, be different)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(lack, look like like other types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(factor, be related use examples)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(lack, look like like other types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(factor, be different)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(lack, look like like other types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(factor, be related use examples)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(lack, look like like other types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(poor people, were treated like)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(factor, be different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(lack, look like like other types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(lack, look like like other types)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(factor, be related use examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(lack, look like like other types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(lack, look like like other types)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(lack, look like like other types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(poor people, were treated like) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(poor people, were treated like)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(lack, look like like other types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(lack, look like like other types)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(lack, look like like other types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(lack, look like like types)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(lack, look like like other types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(lack, look like like types)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(lack, look like like other types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(lack, look like like types)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(lack, look like like other types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(lack, look like like types)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(lack, look like like other types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(lack, be seen as bad thing)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(lack, look like like other types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(lack, be seen as bad thing)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(lack, look like like other types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(lack, affect differently people)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(lack, look like like other types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(lack, be seen as bad thing)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(lack, look like like other types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(lack, affect differently people)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(lack, look like like other types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(lack, affect differently people)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(lack, look like like other types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(lack, affect differently people)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(lack, look like like other types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(lack, be seen as bad thing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(lack, look like like other types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(lack, look like like other types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(lack, look like like other types)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(lack, look like like other types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(lack, look like like other types)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(lack, look like like other types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(factor, be different)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(lack, look like like other types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(factor, be related use examples)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(lack, look like like other types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(poor people, were treated like)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(lack, look like like other types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(factor, be different)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(lack, look like like other types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(factor, be related use examples)