lacrosse player: get paid

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents athlete
Weight: 0.65
, student
Weight: 0.62
Siblings hockey player
Weight: 0.40
, football player
Weight: 0.39
, tennis player
Weight: 0.39
, soccer player
Weight: 0.39
, wrestler
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
get paid 1.00
get paid little 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(athlete, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(lacrosse player, get paid)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(lacrosse player, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(athlete, get paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(lacrosse player, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(athlete, get paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(lacrosse player, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, get paid)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(lacrosse player, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(soccer player, get paid)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(lacrosse player, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(football player, get paid)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(athlete, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(lacrosse player, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(lacrosse player, get paid)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(lacrosse player, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(football player, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(football player, get paid)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(lacrosse player, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(soccer player, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(soccer player, get paid)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(lacrosse player, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(hockey player, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(hockey player, get paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(lacrosse player, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(lacrosse player, get paid)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(lacrosse player, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(lacrosse player, get paid little)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(lacrosse player, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(lacrosse player, get paid little)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(lacrosse player, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(lacrosse player, get paid little)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(lacrosse player, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(lacrosse player, get paid little)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(lacrosse player, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(lacrosse player, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(lacrosse player, get paid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(lacrosse player, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(lacrosse player, get paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(lacrosse player, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(athlete, get paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(lacrosse player, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(football player, get paid)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(lacrosse player, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(hockey player, get paid)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(lacrosse player, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(soccer player, get paid)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(lacrosse player, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(athlete, get paid)