lake: be more sensitive to pollution

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents reservoir
Weight: 0.70
, wetland
Weight: 0.68
, freshwater
Weight: 0.64
, valley
Weight: 0.63
Siblings lake champlain
Weight: 0.89
, lake tahoe
Weight: 0.87
, lake erie
Weight: 0.85
, great salt lake
Weight: 0.80
, lake constance
Weight: 0.79

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more sensitive to pollution 1.00
be more vulnerable to pollution 0.91
be affected by pollution 0.87
be life affected by water pollution 0.85
be more sensitive than oceans 0.84
be aquatic life affected by water pollution 0.82
be polluted 0.79
get polluted 0.79
is polluted 0.79
be become polluted 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(freshwater, be aquatic life affected by water pollution)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(lake, be more sensitive to pollution)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(freshwater, be life affected by water pollution)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(lake, be more sensitive to pollution)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(lake, be more sensitive to pollution)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(freshwater, be life affected by water pollution)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(lake, be more sensitive to pollution)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(freshwater, be aquatic life affected by water pollution)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(lake, be more sensitive to pollution)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(freshwater, be life affected by water pollution)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(lake, be more sensitive to pollution)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(freshwater, be aquatic life affected by water pollution)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(lake, be more sensitive to pollution)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(lake erie, be become polluted)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(lake, be more sensitive to pollution)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(lake erie, is polluted)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(lake, be more sensitive to pollution)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(lake champlain, is polluted)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(freshwater, be life affected by water pollution)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(lake, be more sensitive to pollution)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(lake, be more sensitive to pollution)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(freshwater, be aquatic life affected by water pollution)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(lake, be more sensitive to pollution)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(lake, be more sensitive to pollution)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(lake, be more sensitive to pollution)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(lake champlain, is polluted)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(lake champlain, is polluted)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(lake, be more sensitive to pollution)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(lake erie, is polluted)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(lake erie, is polluted)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(lake, be more sensitive to pollution)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(lake erie, be become polluted)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(lake erie, be become polluted)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(lake, be more sensitive to pollution)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(lake, be more sensitive to pollution)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(lake, be more sensitive to pollution)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(lake, be more vulnerable to pollution)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(lake, be more sensitive to pollution)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(lake, be affected by pollution)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(lake, be more sensitive to pollution)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(lake, be more vulnerable to pollution)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(lake, be more sensitive to pollution)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(lake, be more vulnerable to pollution)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(lake, be more sensitive to pollution)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(lake, be affected by pollution)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(lake, be more sensitive to pollution)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(lake, be affected by pollution)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(lake, be more sensitive to pollution)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(lake, be more vulnerable to pollution)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(lake, be more sensitive to pollution)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(lake, be affected by pollution)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(lake, be more sensitive to pollution)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(lake, be more sensitive to pollution)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(lake, be more sensitive to pollution)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(lake, be more sensitive to pollution)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(lake, be more sensitive to pollution)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(lake, be more sensitive to pollution)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(freshwater, be life affected by water pollution)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(lake, be more sensitive to pollution)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(freshwater, be aquatic life affected by water pollution)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(lake, be more sensitive to pollution)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(lake champlain, is polluted)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(lake, be more sensitive to pollution)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(lake erie, is polluted)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(lake, be more sensitive to pollution)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(lake erie, be become polluted)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(lake, be more sensitive to pollution)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(freshwater, be life affected by water pollution)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(lake, be more sensitive to pollution)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(freshwater, be aquatic life affected by water pollution)