lake: be more vulnerable to pollution

Related concepts

Parents	reservoir Weight: 0.70 , wetland Weight: 0.68 , freshwater Weight: 0.64 , valley Weight: 0.63
Siblings	lake champlain Weight: 0.89 , lake tahoe Weight: 0.87 , lake erie Weight: 0.85 , great salt lake Weight: 0.80 , lake constance Weight: 0.79

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be more vulnerable to pollution	1.00
be more sensitive to pollution	0.91
be affected by pollution	0.89
be life affected by water pollution	0.87
be aquatic life affected by water pollution	0.83
be become polluted	0.81
get polluted	0.81
be polluted	0.81
is polluted	0.80
be more sensitive than oceans	0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(freshwater, be aquatic life affected by water pollution) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(lake, be more vulnerable to pollution)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(freshwater, be life affected by water pollution) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(lake, be more vulnerable to pollution)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(lake, be more vulnerable to pollution) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(freshwater, be life affected by water pollution)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(lake, be more vulnerable to pollution) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(freshwater, be aquatic life affected by water pollution)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(lake, be more vulnerable to pollution) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(freshwater, be life affected by water pollution)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(lake, be more vulnerable to pollution) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(freshwater, be aquatic life affected by water pollution)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(lake, be more vulnerable to pollution) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(lake erie, be become polluted)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(lake, be more vulnerable to pollution) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(lake erie, is polluted)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(lake, be more vulnerable to pollution) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(lake champlain, is polluted)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(freshwater, be life affected by water pollution) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(lake, be more vulnerable to pollution) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(lake, be more vulnerable to pollution)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(freshwater, be aquatic life affected by water pollution) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(lake, be more vulnerable to pollution) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(lake, be more vulnerable to pollution)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(lake, be more vulnerable to pollution) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

Remarkable(lake champlain, is polluted) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Plausible(lake champlain, is polluted)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(lake, be more vulnerable to pollution) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

Remarkable(lake erie, be become polluted) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Plausible(lake erie, be become polluted)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(lake, be more vulnerable to pollution) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

Remarkable(lake erie, is polluted) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(lake erie, is polluted)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(lake, be more vulnerable to pollution) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Salient(lake, be more vulnerable to pollution)

Similarity expansion

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.91

Salient(lake, be more vulnerable to pollution) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Salient(lake, be more sensitive to pollution)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.91

Typical(lake, be more vulnerable to pollution) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(lake, be more sensitive to pollution)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.91

Typical(lake, be more vulnerable to pollution) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(lake, be affected by pollution)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(lake, be more vulnerable to pollution) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(lake, be more sensitive to pollution)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.91

Salient(lake, be more vulnerable to pollution) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Salient(lake, be affected by pollution)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(lake, be more vulnerable to pollution) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(lake, be affected by pollution)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(lake, be more vulnerable to pollution) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(lake, be more sensitive to pollution)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(lake, be more vulnerable to pollution) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(lake, be affected by pollution)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.91

Salient(lake, be more vulnerable to pollution) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(lake, be more vulnerable to pollution) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(lake, be more vulnerable to pollution)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(lake, be more vulnerable to pollution) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(lake, be more vulnerable to pollution)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(lake, be more vulnerable to pollution) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(freshwater, be life affected by water pollution)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(lake, be more vulnerable to pollution) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(freshwater, be aquatic life affected by water pollution)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(lake, be more vulnerable to pollution) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(lake champlain, is polluted)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(lake, be more vulnerable to pollution) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(lake erie, is polluted)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(lake, be more vulnerable to pollution) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(lake erie, be become polluted)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.91

Typical(lake, be more vulnerable to pollution) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(freshwater, be life affected by water pollution)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.91

Typical(lake, be more vulnerable to pollution) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(freshwater, be aquatic life affected by water pollution)