lamination: has quality bad

Related concepts

Parents	process Weight: 0.65 , material Weight: 0.58 , method Weight: 0.57 , application Weight: 0.47 , layer Weight: 0.47
Siblings	adhesive tape Weight: 0.34 , aluminum oxide Weight: 0.34 , packaging Weight: 0.34 , aluminum foil Weight: 0.34 , molding Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality bad	1.00
has quality better	0.90
is quality	0.87
be of quality	0.86
has quality use	0.86
has quality making	0.83
be of high quality	0.82
has quality cost	0.81
be bad for environment	0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(method, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(lamination, has quality bad)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(process, is quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(lamination, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(lamination, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(method, has quality bad)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(lamination, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(process, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(lamination, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(method, has quality bad)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(lamination, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(process, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(lamination, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Remarkable(molding, has quality bad)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(lamination, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, has quality bad)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(lamination, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(packaging, has quality bad)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(lamination, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, be bad for environment)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(lamination, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(aluminum oxide, is quality)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(method, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

Remarkable(lamination, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(lamination, has quality bad)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(process, is quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

Remarkable(lamination, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(lamination, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(lamination, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

Remarkable(molding, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(molding, has quality bad)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(lamination, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

Remarkable(packaging, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(packaging, has quality bad)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(lamination, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

Remarkable(aluminum foil, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, has quality bad)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(lamination, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(aluminum oxide, is quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(aluminum oxide, is quality)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(lamination, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

Remarkable(aluminum foil, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, be bad for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(lamination, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Salient(lamination, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.88

Salient(lamination, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(lamination, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(lamination, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(lamination, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(lamination, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(lamination, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(process, is quality)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(lamination, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(method, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(lamination, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(molding, has quality bad)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(lamination, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(packaging, has quality bad)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(lamination, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(aluminum foil, has quality bad)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(lamination, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(aluminum foil, be bad for environment)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(lamination, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(aluminum oxide, is quality)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.86

Typical(lamination, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(method, has quality bad)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.86

Typical(lamination, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(process, is quality)