lance: were armstrong amazing victories

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents weapon
Weight: 0.61
, brand
Weight: 0.49
, character
Weight: 0.49
, athlete
Weight: 0.48
Siblings spear
Weight: 0.34
, blaster
Weight: 0.33
, razor blade
Weight: 0.33
, chemical weapon
Weight: 0.33
, sword
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
were armstrong amazing victories 1.00
were armstrong amazing victories in tour france 0.93
were armstrong amazing victories in tour de france 0.89
was armstrong famous 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(lance, were armstrong amazing victories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(lance, were armstrong amazing victories)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(lance, were armstrong amazing victories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(lance, were armstrong amazing victories in tour france)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(lance, were armstrong amazing victories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(lance, were armstrong amazing victories in tour de france)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(lance, were armstrong amazing victories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(lance, were armstrong amazing victories in tour france)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(lance, were armstrong amazing victories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(lance, were armstrong amazing victories in tour de france)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(lance, were armstrong amazing victories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(lance, were armstrong amazing victories in tour france)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(lance, were armstrong amazing victories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(lance, were armstrong amazing victories in tour france)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(lance, were armstrong amazing victories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(lance, were armstrong amazing victories in tour de france)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(lance, were armstrong amazing victories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(lance, were armstrong amazing victories in tour de france)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(lance, were armstrong amazing victories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(lance, was armstrong famous)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(lance, were armstrong amazing victories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(lance, was armstrong famous)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(lance, were armstrong amazing victories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(lance, was armstrong famous)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(lance, were armstrong amazing victories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(lance, was armstrong famous)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(lance, were armstrong amazing victories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(lance, were armstrong amazing victories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(lance, were armstrong amazing victories)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(lance, were armstrong amazing victories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(lance, were armstrong amazing victories)