lance: were armstrong amazing victories in tour de france

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents weapon
Weight: 0.61
, brand
Weight: 0.49
, character
Weight: 0.49
, athlete
Weight: 0.48
Siblings spear
Weight: 0.34
, blaster
Weight: 0.33
, razor blade
Weight: 0.33
, chemical weapon
Weight: 0.33
, sword
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
were armstrong amazing victories in tour de france 1.00
were armstrong amazing victories in tour france 0.97
were armstrong amazing victories 0.89
was armstrong famous 0.78
be armstrong famous 0.78
be armstrong strong 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(lance, were armstrong amazing victories in tour de france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(lance, were armstrong amazing victories in tour de france)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(lance, were armstrong amazing victories in tour de france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(lance, were armstrong amazing victories)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(lance, were armstrong amazing victories in tour de france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(lance, were armstrong amazing victories in tour france)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(lance, were armstrong amazing victories in tour de france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(lance, were armstrong amazing victories)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(lance, were armstrong amazing victories in tour de france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(lance, were armstrong amazing victories)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(lance, were armstrong amazing victories in tour de france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(lance, were armstrong amazing victories in tour france)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(lance, were armstrong amazing victories in tour de france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(lance, were armstrong amazing victories in tour france)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(lance, were armstrong amazing victories in tour de france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(lance, were armstrong amazing victories in tour france)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(lance, were armstrong amazing victories in tour de france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(lance, were armstrong amazing victories)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(lance, were armstrong amazing victories in tour de france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(lance, be armstrong strong)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(lance, were armstrong amazing victories in tour de france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(lance, be armstrong strong)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(lance, were armstrong amazing victories in tour de france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(lance, be armstrong strong)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(lance, were armstrong amazing victories in tour de france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(lance, be armstrong strong)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(lance, were armstrong amazing victories in tour de france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(lance, be armstrong famous)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(lance, were armstrong amazing victories in tour de france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(lance, was armstrong famous)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(lance, were armstrong amazing victories in tour de france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(lance, be armstrong famous)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(lance, were armstrong amazing victories in tour de france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(lance, was armstrong famous)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(lance, were armstrong amazing victories in tour de france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(lance, be armstrong famous)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(lance, were armstrong amazing victories in tour de france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(lance, was armstrong famous)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(lance, were armstrong amazing victories in tour de france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(lance, be armstrong famous)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(lance, were armstrong amazing victories in tour de france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(lance, was armstrong famous)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(lance, were armstrong amazing victories in tour de france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(lance, were armstrong amazing victories in tour de france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(lance, were armstrong amazing victories in tour de france)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(lance, were armstrong amazing victories in tour de france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(lance, were armstrong amazing victories in tour de france)