land: be considered resource

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents property
Weight: 0.62
, territory
Weight: 0.61
, gift
Weight: 0.61
, nation
Weight: 0.61
Siblings crown land
Weight: 0.77
, national forest
Weight: 0.72
, national monument
Weight: 0.69
, national park
Weight: 0.69
, wetland
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered resource 1.00
be considered as resource 0.99
be considered important resource 0.98
be considered as important resource 0.97
be resource 0.95
be considered natural resource 0.95
be considered important natural resource 0.93
is important resource 0.93
is natural resource 0.90
has quality resource 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(land, be considered resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(land, be considered resource)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(land, be considered resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(land, be considered important resource)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(land, be considered resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(land, be considered as important resource)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(land, be considered resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(land, is important resource)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(land, be considered resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(land, is natural resource)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(land, be considered resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(land, has quality resource)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(land, be considered resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(land, is natural resource)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(land, be considered resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(land, be considered important resource)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(land, be considered resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(land, be considered as important resource)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(land, be considered resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(land, is natural resource)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(land, be considered resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(land, has quality resource)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(land, be considered resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(land, is important resource)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(land, be considered resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(land, is natural resource)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(land, be considered resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(land, be considered as important resource)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(land, be considered resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(land, be considered important resource)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(land, be considered resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(land, be considered as important resource)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(land, be considered resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(land, has quality resource)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(land, be considered resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(land, be considered important resource)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(land, be considered resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(land, is important resource)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(land, be considered resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(land, has quality resource)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(land, be considered resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(land, is important resource)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(land, be considered resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(land, be considered resource) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(land, be considered resource)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(land, be considered resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(land, be considered resource)