land: has quality resource

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents property
Weight: 0.62
, territory
Weight: 0.61
, gift
Weight: 0.61
, nation
Weight: 0.61
Siblings crown land
Weight: 0.77
, national forest
Weight: 0.72
, national monument
Weight: 0.69
, national park
Weight: 0.69
, wetland
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality resource 1.00
be resource 0.94
is important resource 0.92
is natural resource 0.90
be considered resource 0.89
is important natural resource 0.89
be considered as resource 0.88
be considered important resource 0.88
be considered as important resource 0.88
be considered natural resource 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(land, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(land, has quality resource)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(land, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(land, be considered resource)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(land, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(land, be considered resource)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(land, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(land, be considered resource)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(land, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(land, is important resource)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(land, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(land, is important resource)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(land, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(land, is natural resource)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(land, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(land, is important natural resource)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(land, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(land, is natural resource)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(land, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(land, is natural resource)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(land, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(land, be considered important resource)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(land, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(land, be considered resource)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(land, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(land, be considered important resource)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(land, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(land, be considered as important resource)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(land, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(land, is important natural resource)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(land, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(land, be considered as important resource)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(land, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(land, is natural resource)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(land, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(land, be considered as important resource)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(land, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(land, be considered as important resource)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(land, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(land, is important resource)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(land, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(land, be considered important resource)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(land, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(land, be considered important resource)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(land, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(land, is important resource)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(land, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(land, is important natural resource)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(land, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(land, is important natural resource)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(land, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(land, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(land, has quality resource)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(land, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(land, has quality resource)